There have been a number of things going on in our society and in our various workplaces recently that are challenging some pretty foundational assumptions we have about ourselves and other people.
I’ve heard people around me recently express a desire to remain unaware of where someone else stands on a particular topic or perspective, rooted in the understanding that ”It’s easier to love you or care for you or respect you if I don’t have to disagree with you.” While this may temporarily prevent discord, in the long run, it doesn’t promote peace.
Multiple studies show that we each perceive things a little bit differently. Twelve eyewitnesses to the same incident will have a dozen different accountings of the event. Part of that is because each of the twelve onlookers has a slightly different vantage point. Each person views the event from where they stand, not from where the person next to them stands. To get the full picture of what actually happened, we would need input from all twelve.
We would need to ask each of them, “what did you see from where you were standing?”
We wouldn’t say “Well you were standing to my left, so you must be wrong; your perspective is irrelevant” or, “You were standing 6 inches to my right, so I don’t want to hear from you, I’ll just assume you saw what I saw.” Would we?
Take my brother, my sister, and myself for example. As kids, we had the same parents and were raised simultaneously in the same household. Yet we have three different paces with which we engage with the world around us;
our decisions are informed by different outlooks; our actions are driven by different thought processes; our interactions with other human beings are different. Because we are different.
I would not have the same conversation with my brother that I have with my sister. My parents would not have the same conversation with my sister as they would with me. We are different.
We shouldn’t assume we all agree. We shouldn’t close ourselves off from those who disagree or devalue them or ruin perfectly good relationships just because we see things differently.
We should seek to understand. And, if our perspectives are different, we should try out the phrase, “let’s agree to disagree.” At its core, it means “lets still value each other. Let’s acknowledge that you matter, and you have your view. And I matter, and I have my view. And we matter more than this disagreement.
We can disagree on a topic, and still agree about many other things. We can have different perspectives, and still be equally valuable as human beings. We can have experienced life differently, and still both have lived!
It’s become tempting to write each other off because of a certain viewpoint. And with our increased access to “unfriend” or “unfollow” buttons, it’s become even easier to do so. But that dialogue, that disagreement, can be a valuable learning tool if we’re willing to embrace that curiosity, if we’re willing to find out why.